<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faxing and VoIP at a Near Flawless Success Rate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/faxing-and-voip-at-a-near-flawless-success-rate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/faxing-and-voip-at-a-near-flawless-success-rate</link>
	<description>Everything you need to know about VoIP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:27:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Kinnear</title>
		<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/faxing-and-voip-at-a-near-flawless-success-rate/comment-page-1#comment-70852</link>
		<dc:creator>James Kinnear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=1892#comment-70852</guid>
		<description>I have had much better results using point to point (IP Dialing) between two fax optimized ATA&#039;s than with using T.38. With a reasonable amount of bandwidth at both ends, we are able to get close to 100% reliability. Try it ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had much better results using point to point (IP Dialing) between two fax optimized ATA&#8217;s than with using T.38. With a reasonable amount of bandwidth at both ends, we are able to get close to 100% reliability. Try it <img src='http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Pollack</title>
		<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/faxing-and-voip-at-a-near-flawless-success-rate/comment-page-1#comment-27272</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Pollack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=1892#comment-27272</guid>
		<description>Where do I get this cable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do I get this cable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/faxing-and-voip-at-a-near-flawless-success-rate/comment-page-1#comment-10032</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=1892#comment-10032</guid>
		<description>@Mark, 
I can understand where you are coming from with that statement. Nothing was new, or exciting and barely had IP in it. But the post was meant for those people that have purchased servers and cards that represent this type of set up and to give them a cost effective and easy solution. 

There is a large customer base in the past year that have spent $1200-2500 on the setup of 1 server and 2 PCI cards and it would be in their best interest to get the $10 cable to make it a successful faxing solution.

The post was also meant for those still learning the trade that might not have the knowledge or time to do the suggestion you proposed. Mine was Easy, Cost effective and reliable. 

Thank you for your comment and i look forward to anything additional you may have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark,<br />
I can understand where you are coming from with that statement. Nothing was new, or exciting and barely had IP in it. But the post was meant for those people that have purchased servers and cards that represent this type of set up and to give them a cost effective and easy solution. </p>
<p>There is a large customer base in the past year that have spent $1200-2500 on the setup of 1 server and 2 PCI cards and it would be in their best interest to get the $10 cable to make it a successful faxing solution.</p>
<p>The post was also meant for those still learning the trade that might not have the knowledge or time to do the suggestion you proposed. Mine was Easy, Cost effective and reliable. </p>
<p>Thank you for your comment and i look forward to anything additional you may have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Petersen</title>
		<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/faxing-and-voip-at-a-near-flawless-success-rate/comment-page-1#comment-9972</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=1892#comment-9972</guid>
		<description>Just one question, what do this have to do with VoIP, where is the IP in this.
This is just a clever analog to ISDN converter, this has nothing to do with VoIP
For that you need a network kabel and 2 servers one with the analog card and the other with the ISDN card and a network cable in betwen.
No the best solution for Fax and VoIP is g.711/g.722 and a large network connection with QoS, and large jitter buffer, and ofcause a fax where you can set to use a low connection speed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just one question, what do this have to do with VoIP, where is the IP in this.<br />
This is just a clever analog to ISDN converter, this has nothing to do with VoIP<br />
For that you need a network kabel and 2 servers one with the analog card and the other with the ISDN card and a network cable in betwen.<br />
No the best solution for Fax and VoIP is g.711/g.722 and a large network connection with QoS, and large jitter buffer, and ofcause a fax where you can set to use a low connection speed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

