A couple days ago I linked to an Axis study that set out to prove that the cost of IP surveillance is now less expensive than its analog counterpart.
Now there is a healthy debate over at IP Video Market Info about the validity of this study. Check it out:
Debating Axis’s IP vs Analog Cost Comparison
Some of the major sticking points are:
The flexibility, scalability, and high quality images set IP cameras apart from analog. Remote access of live images from anywhere in the world including viewing video surveillance on your phone puts analog in the backseat, in my opinion.
Like any other kind of technology, over time, functionality continues to increase as the price goes down. There may be debate now over some marginal price differences but that surely will not last.
https://youtu.be/hDzakM8YGGI Knowing about UC Solutions and how to sell them can lead to added success…
Did you know the first 9-1-1 call dates back to 1968 in Alabama? AT&T introduced…
https://youtu.be/ibAll_fVU4g?si=9O6QVec9cL6YjtDE Your May VoIP News Update is here! In this month's episode, we cover a…
https://youtu.be/KrdtAr7TDHI?si=Te6zARkJkDZKoW9R If you haven't seen the Fanvil V62W Wi-Fi IP Phone, you may want to…
You want to optimize your meeting space or conference room to ensure every remote or…
https://youtu.be/58HX8VIljrY?si=v4-BBtOhIiDujgch In the fast-paced world of Telecommunications, things can happen, and sometimes those things require…
View Comments
I agree with the truth that IP systems are still much more costly than analog. This is one reason why we are not being able to rapidly roll out full IP based surveillance in the Taj Group of Hotels. Second point, most facilities do have some surveillance systems, mostly older analog versions. These cannot be dumped. Hence a hybrid solution is the best suited. We have done this at the Taj flagship hotel in Mumbai.
Thanks for sharing your experience. Hybrid solutions are great for adding features and longevity to your existing systems.