Q: Dear Mr. Andrews, I have heard some terms lately including “HD Voice”, “Wideband VoIP” and “Wideband Audio.” Do you know what’s behind this and which manufacturers support it?

A: These are industry marketing terms which typically refer to the use of higher quality voice codecs, such as G.722, to deliver voice quality and richness on a VoIP call that surpasses the quality that is possible on a traditional PSTN call. A PSTN “toll quality” call or mobile phone call is limited by the bandwidth (300-3,300Hz) utilized in the PSTN. An IP based call can take advantage of technologies that may require additional bandwidth but can deliver superior call quality.

G.722, the ITU’s wideband speech codec captures 7,000Hz (7kHz) of bandwidth, more than twice the amount of speech data in a traditional TDN/PSTN call, enabling new levels of voice clarity. This increased call quality facilitates both parties in a conversation being able to better distinguish between vowels, consonants and other nuances of speech, reducing listener fatigue and improving concentration.

Polycom has been banging the drum loudly for “HD Voice”, and they have built in G.722 codec support into most of their newer SoundPoint IP Series phones, including the IP550, 560 and 650 and their IP6000/7000 Series conference phones.

Cisco supports G.722 wideband codec on their CP-7942G, CP-7962G, CP-7945G, CP-7965G and CP-7975G Unified IP Phone models. Additionally, the CP-7906G, CP-7911G, CP-7931G, CP-7941G-GE, CP-7961G, CP-7961G-GE, CP-7970G and CP-7971G-GE models can be upgraded to support G.722 with an option wideband handset or headset.

Snom recently released an accessory handset called KlarVoice that is compatible with all their IP phone models (300, 320, 360, 370) and adds G.722 wideband capabilities to their existing phone models. In addition, their new 820 model offers native support for wideband audio.

Grandstream and Aastra also offer support for G.722 in many of their products.

Discussion

10 Comments
Comment

Your email address will not be published.

  1. Actually, the term “HDVoice” is a Polycom trademark. The generic term is “wideband telephony.”

    It’s also worth noting that lesser IP phones, like the Grandstream line, may support G.722. However, the benefits are only realized when using a headset. The built-in transducers are not up to the task.

    Reply
  2. @ Michael:

    We totally agree (I think Cory noted that HD Voice was an industry marketing term..sort of that Kleenex/tissue scenario).

    I have never personally done G.722 on a Grandstream phone, however, there newer models have made some solid leaps and I wouldn’t be surprised if there have been upgrades in this department.

    Reply
  3. Another great post, Mr. Andrews! As you may have heard, we at VoIP Users Conference are doing a test of wideband conferencing on Friday Nov 7th at Noon EST. Here’s more about that: http://bit.ly/mgblog
    I’ve tested G.722 on eyeBeam, Polycom 650 and Siemens S675IP. The most marked difference is on the Polycom, but then their audio is already very good, as you all know.

    Reply
  4. @Randulo:

    Very nice..it would be interesting to have the conference in both wideband and normal codec and somehow splice the two together after in order to hear the difference.

    Reply
  5. Michael – you are correct, all participants in an HD calls must have an HD compatible endpoint device or softphone. The aforementioned hardware phones support HD, and we recently uncovered a SIP softphone that support G.722 wideband audio codec as well. It’s called QuteCom and you can find it here http://www.qutecom.org/

    Reply
  6. Well counterpath’s X-Lite (and its siblings bria and eyebeam) support wideband codecs though not G.722. It supports Broadvoice-32 and Broadvoice-32 FEC

    And to be honest Using X-Lite (soft-phone) with our in house Asterisks server has been one hell of a combination and the quality of the sound really is magnificent. Combine that with the Data draw being minimal compared to a few other soft phones we have tried.

    Reply
  7. At ZipDX, we are very committed to wideband audio as a critical enhancement to conference calls, where the enhanced fidelity really helps in recognizing voices, understanding accented speakers, and distinguishing al those consonants that get muffled in narrowband and result in endless “could you repeat that?” requests. The net, as noted by Cory, is greatly reduced fatigue (especially on those marathon calls) and more brainpower focused on the business at hand.

    Add Avaya (one-X) and Shoretel to the list of vendors building wideband-capable phones. Audiocodes also just announced wideband phones.

    “Both ends” do indeed need to be wideband-capable to get the full benefit. At ZipDX, we support conference calls with a mix of wideband and narrowband participants. The widebanders will hear each other in wideband. The quality difference is quite obvious if you connect in wideband and then listen to the contrast between two other participants, one in wideband and another in narrowband.

    “Polycom HD Voice” is a Polycom trademark, but I think we can all say “HD Voice” and get away with it.

    Reply
    • Helio, you’ll most likely want to be using G.729, as it offers the best compression.

      Teracall has the table which shows how the codec’s theoretical bandwidth usage expands with UDP/IP headers:

      Codec BR NEB
      G.711 64 Kbps 87.2 Kbps
      G.729 8 Kbps 31.2 Kbps
      G.723.1 6.4 Kbps 21.9 Kbps
      G.723.1 5.3 Kbps 20.8 Kbps
      G.726 32 Kbps 55.2 Kbps
      G.726 24 Kbps 47.2 Kbps
      G.728 16 Kbps 31.5 Kbps
      iLBC 15 Kbps 27.7 Kbps

      BR = Bit rate
      NEB = Nominal Ethernet Bandwidth (one direction)

      Reply