<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNet Blogger Matt Asay on VoIP: &#8220;..it&#8217;s all rubbish.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/cnet-blogger-matt-asay-on-voip-its-all-rubbish/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/cnet-blogger-matt-asay-on-voip-its-all-rubbish</link>
	<description>Everything you need to know about VoIP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:27:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Garrett Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/cnet-blogger-matt-asay-on-voip-its-all-rubbish/comment-page-1#comment-9522</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=1872#comment-9522</guid>
		<description>@Roderickm 

Great point, one that is vastly misunderstood by most customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Roderickm </p>
<p>Great point, one that is vastly misunderstood by most customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roderickm</title>
		<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/cnet-blogger-matt-asay-on-voip-its-all-rubbish/comment-page-1#comment-9232</link>
		<dc:creator>roderickm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=1872#comment-9232</guid>
		<description>For readers that may not be as familiar with the many ways to deploy VoIP, it&#039;s important to point out that Matt&#039;s comments are criticisms of voice over the internet -- not VoIP in general.

If the underlying IP network is unreliable, then packetized voice calls will be unreliable. For some, the internet is an acceptable transport for voice. But there&#039;s no guarantee of reliability across internet networks.

There are many customers that enjoy the benefits of voice-data convergence on their LAN, but use dedicated circuits (T1 or POTS) to connect their business to the outside world. It&#039;s easy to guarantee VoIP performance when you own the LAN infrastructure -- no so on the hit-or-miss internet.

Rod Montgomery
Director of Services, Digium, Inc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For readers that may not be as familiar with the many ways to deploy VoIP, it&#8217;s important to point out that Matt&#8217;s comments are criticisms of voice over the internet &#8212; not VoIP in general.</p>
<p>If the underlying IP network is unreliable, then packetized voice calls will be unreliable. For some, the internet is an acceptable transport for voice. But there&#8217;s no guarantee of reliability across internet networks.</p>
<p>There are many customers that enjoy the benefits of voice-data convergence on their LAN, but use dedicated circuits (T1 or POTS) to connect their business to the outside world. It&#8217;s easy to guarantee VoIP performance when you own the LAN infrastructure &#8212; no so on the hit-or-miss internet.</p>
<p>Rod Montgomery<br />
Director of Services, Digium, Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randulo</title>
		<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/cnet-blogger-matt-asay-on-voip-its-all-rubbish/comment-page-1#comment-8622</link>
		<dc:creator>randulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=1872#comment-8622</guid>
		<description>Although there is some truth to voip sometimes being rubbish, depending on many factors, I&#039;m surprised this common mistake of talking about saving money enters into it.
VoIP is *not* about saving money - it least it hasn&#039;t been for me since Dialpad (aka &quot;sir, you&#039;re breaking up&quot;) and FWD (aka &quot;is FWD down?&quot;).
This said, a few of us who love VoIP for what it really brings to the mix in small business, including Dan York, Michael Graves and myself have all posted about how we retain POTS lines :) I need at least one per location for DSL anyway, so why not have a copper pair number for emergencies, including power outage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although there is some truth to voip sometimes being rubbish, depending on many factors, I&#8217;m surprised this common mistake of talking about saving money enters into it.<br />
VoIP is *not* about saving money &#8211; it least it hasn&#8217;t been for me since Dialpad (aka &#8220;sir, you&#8217;re breaking up&#8221;) and FWD (aka &#8220;is FWD down?&#8221;).<br />
This said, a few of us who love VoIP for what it really brings to the mix in small business, including Dan York, Michael Graves and myself have all posted about how we retain POTS lines <img src='http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I need at least one per location for DSL anyway, so why not have a copper pair number for emergencies, including power outage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoIP Lover</title>
		<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/cnet-blogger-matt-asay-on-voip-its-all-rubbish/comment-page-1#comment-8422</link>
		<dc:creator>VoIP Lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=1872#comment-8422</guid>
		<description>Cory, Matt is just getting negative attention stunt for getting more traffic on his blog. Any upcoming technology is always on its development stage...everyday, every minute. 

I request just to ignore this kind of NAY SAYERS....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cory, Matt is just getting negative attention stunt for getting more traffic on his blog. Any upcoming technology is always on its development stage&#8230;everyday, every minute. </p>
<p>I request just to ignore this kind of NAY SAYERS&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/cnet-blogger-matt-asay-on-voip-its-all-rubbish/comment-page-1#comment-8222</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=1872#comment-8222</guid>
		<description>Cory, it seems that Matt is a flip-flopper. An industry outsider who merely writes based on the trends of the day...which are set by those who actually know what is going on (the primary reason I do not read sites like CNET).

I suspect that last weeks slew of posts (one of which I wrote) about the less than impressive subscriber numbers from the more well known business VoIP numbers reported.

I don&#039;t think VoIP is rubbish (obviously), but I do think that it is definitely not growing and progressing as quickly as many would like. At the end of the day, we have probably hit a temporary plateau...as new customer types take a look at the technology, most have had to been a little slow to respond to the changing demands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cory, it seems that Matt is a flip-flopper. An industry outsider who merely writes based on the trends of the day&#8230;which are set by those who actually know what is going on (the primary reason I do not read sites like CNET).</p>
<p>I suspect that last weeks slew of posts (one of which I wrote) about the less than impressive subscriber numbers from the more well known business VoIP numbers reported.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think VoIP is rubbish (obviously), but I do think that it is definitely not growing and progressing as quickly as many would like. At the end of the day, we have probably hit a temporary plateau&#8230;as new customer types take a look at the technology, most have had to been a little slow to respond to the changing demands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

