<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will high definition or standards revive voice communications?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/high-definition-or-standards/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/high-definition-or-standards</link>
	<description>Everything you need to know about VoIP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:27:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Garrett Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/high-definition-or-standards/comment-page-1#comment-36282</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=5842#comment-36282</guid>
		<description>@ Advantia VoIP

That&#039;s a great point.

I&#039;m certain that HD voice is the future, but in the present it&#039;s still a tough sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Advantia VoIP</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a great point.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certain that HD voice is the future, but in the present it&#8217;s still a tough sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advantia VoIP</title>
		<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/high-definition-or-standards/comment-page-1#comment-36212</link>
		<dc:creator>Advantia VoIP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=5842#comment-36212</guid>
		<description>When it comes to voice quality, better is certainly better. The issue has always been whether customers will pay for better quality.  HD Voice at this point reminds me of my first ADSL connection; a fast link to a slow internet.  Calling someone on an old cell phone makes the HD Voice feature of my Polycomm phone a moot point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to voice quality, better is certainly better. The issue has always been whether customers will pay for better quality.  HD Voice at this point reminds me of my first ADSL connection; a fast link to a slow internet.  Calling someone on an old cell phone makes the HD Voice feature of my Polycomm phone a moot point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Garcia</title>
		<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/high-definition-or-standards/comment-page-1#comment-35892</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=5842#comment-35892</guid>
		<description>I think you nailed it on the head, Garrett, when you said that better sounding phone calls are not going to lead a resurgence in the voice industry. It adds another selling point, and people are impressed when they hear it, but it won&#039;t change the game... To hear a sample of HD Voice vs. SD Voice click here: http://tinyurl.com/c3vdxq

The file came from Polycom, I simply mashed them together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you nailed it on the head, Garrett, when you said that better sounding phone calls are not going to lead a resurgence in the voice industry. It adds another selling point, and people are impressed when they hear it, but it won&#8217;t change the game&#8230; To hear a sample of HD Voice vs. SD Voice click here: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/c3vdxq" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/c3vdxq</a></p>
<p>The file came from Polycom, I simply mashed them together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/high-definition-or-standards/comment-page-1#comment-35702</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=5842#comment-35702</guid>
		<description>@ Daniel

I wouldn&#039;t call it a manifesto :) 

I understand your point that HD is potentially the &quot;something else&quot;, but perhaps because it is early and I&#039;ve &quot;seen the numbers&quot; behind HD voice that I came to doubt it as a driver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Daniel</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t call it a manifesto <img src='http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I understand your point that HD is potentially the &#8220;something else&#8221;, but perhaps because it is early and I&#8217;ve &#8220;seen the numbers&#8221; behind HD voice that I came to doubt it as a driver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Berninger</title>
		<link>http://www.voipsupply.com/blog/high-definition-or-standards/comment-page-1#comment-35692</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Berninger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=5842#comment-35692</guid>
		<description>Thanks for considering the HD Connect Manifesto.  Your Connect Manifesto makes good points, but the list has not motivated interconnection.  I believe this is the case, because SIP interconnection without HD yields the same thing PSTN interconnection offers.  HD interconnection yields something the PSTN can not provide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for considering the HD Connect Manifesto.  Your Connect Manifesto makes good points, but the list has not motivated interconnection.  I believe this is the case, because SIP interconnection without HD yields the same thing PSTN interconnection offers.  HD interconnection yields something the PSTN can not provide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

